Keywords
coronary artery disease
type 2 diabetes mellitus
endothelial dysfunction
modifiable risk factors
non-modifiable risk factors
How to Cite
Abstract
Evaluation of values of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with coronary artery disease and diabetes type 2, depending on the nature of the coronary arteries lesions, as well as its relationship with the modifiable and non-modifiable factors of cardiovascular risk. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity is presented as an integral indicator of cardiovascular risk.References
Бідучак А.С. Епідеміологічні особливості хвороб системи кровообігу в Україні й Чернівецькій області / А.С. Бідучак, І.Д. Шкробанець, С.І. Леонець // Буковинський медичний вісник. – 2013. – Т. 17, № 3 (67). – Ч. 2. – С. 100–103.
Стабільна ішемічна хвороба серця: адаптована клінічна настанова, заснована на доказах. – К., 2016. – 177 с.
Уніфікований клінічний протокол первинної та вторинної (спеціалізованої) медичної допомоги: Стабільна ішемічна хвороба серця / Hаказ МОЗ України від 02.03.16 № 152. – 61 с.
Recommendations for improving and standardizing vascular research on arterial stiffness: A scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Hypertension / R.R. Townsend, I.B. Wilkinson, E.L. Schiffrin et al. – 2015. – Vol. 66, Suppl.3. – P. 698–722.
Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications / L.M. Van Bortel, S. Laurent, P. Boutouyrie et al. // Eur. Heart J. – 2006. – Vol. 27, Suppl. 21. – P. 2588–2605.
Expert consensus document on the measurement of aortic stiffness in daily practice using carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity / L.M. Van Bortel, S. Laurent, P. Boutouyrie et al. // J. Hypertension. – 2012. – Vol. 30, Suppl. 3. – P. 445–448.
Wilkinson I.B. Artery society guidelines for validation of non-invasive haemodynamic measurement devices: P. 1, arterial pulse wave velocity / I.B. Wilkinson, C.M. McEniery, G. Schillaci // Artery Research. – 2010. – Vol. 4. – P. 34–40.
Prognostic value of aortic pulse wave velocity as index of arterial stiffness in the general population / T. Willum-Hansen, J.A. Staessen, C. Torp-Pedersen et al. // Circulation. – 2006. – Vol. 113. – P. 664–670.
Analysis of the regional pulse wave velocity by Doppler: methodology and reproducibility / J.-P. Baguet, B.A. Kingwell, A.L. Dart et al. // Human Hypertension. – 2003. –Vol. 17. – P. 407–412.
Determinants of pulse wave velocity in healthy people and in the presence of cardiovascular risk factors: establishing normal and reference values / F. Mattace-Raso, A. Hofman, G.C. Verwoert et al. // Eur. Heart J. – 2010. – Vol. 31, Suppl. 19. – P. 2338–2350.
Doppler ultrasound in the measurement of pulse wave velocity: agreement with the Complior method / J. Calabia, P. Torguet, M. Garcia, I. Garcia // Cardiovasc. Ultrasound. – 2011. – Vol. 9. – P. 13.
Pulse wave velocity and the non-invasive methods used to assess it: Complior, SphygmoCor, Arteriograph and Vicorder / J.M. Davies, M.A. Bailey, K.J. Griffin, D.J. Scott // Vascular. – 2012. – Vol. 20, Suppl. 6. – P. 342–349.
Measurement of pulse wave velocity using pulse wave doppler ultrasound: comparison with arterial tonometry / B. Jiang, B. Liu, K.L. McNeill, P.J. Chowienczyk // Ultrasound in Medicine and Biology. – 2008. – Vol. 34, Suppl. 3. – P. 509–512.
Estimation of an age-specific reference interval for pulse wave velocity: a meta-analysis / A.R. Khoshdel, A. Thakkinstian, S.L. Carney, J. Attia // J. Hypertension. – 2006. – Vol. 24, Suppl. 7. – P. 1231–1237.
Wohlfahrt P. Lower-extremity arterial stiffness vs. aortic stiffness in the general population / P. Wohlfahrt, A. Krajčoviechová, J. Seidlerová // Hypertension Research. – 2013. – Vol. 36, Suppl. 8. – P. 718–724.
Mancia G. Guidelines for the Management of Arterial Hypertension: The Task Force for the Management of Arterial Hypertension of the European Society of Hypertension (ESH) and of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) / G. Mancia, G. De Backer, A. Dominiczak // J. Hypertension. – 2007. – Vol. 25. – P. 1105–1187.
ESH/ESC guidelines for the management of arterial hypertension / G. Mancia, R. Fagard, K. Narkiewicz et al. // Eur. Heart J. – 2013. – Vol. 34. – P. 2159 – 2219.
Noninvasive determination of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity depends critically on assessment of travel distance: a comparison with invasive measurement / T. Weber, M. Ammer, M. Rammer et al. // J. Hypertension. – 2009. – Vol. 27, Suppl. 8. – P. 1624–1630.
Kilic H. An invasive but simple and accurate method for ascending aorta-femoral artery pulse wave velocity measurement / H. Kilic, S. Yelgec, O. Salih // Blood Press. – 2013. – Vol. 22, Suppl. 1. – P. 45–50.
European network for non-invasive investigation of large arteries. Expert consensus document on arterial stiffness: methodological issues and clinical applications / S. Laurent, J. Cockcroft, L. Van Bortel et al. // Eur. Heart J. – 2006. – Vol. 27. – P. 2588–2605.
Comparison of pulse wave velocity assessed by three different techniques: Arteriograph, Complior, and Echo-tracking / D.J. Mihalcea, M. Florescu, B.M. Suran et al. // Heart Vessels. – 2016. – Vol. 31, Suppl. 4. – P. 568–577.
Mitchell G.F. Arterial stiffness and cardiovascular events: The Framingham Heart Study / G.F. Mitchell, Sh.-J. Hwang, R.S. Vasan // Circulation. – 2010. – Vol. 121. – Vol. 4. – P. 505–511.
Comparison of aortic pulse wave velocity measured by three techniques: Complior, SphygmoCor and Arteriograph / M.W. Rajzer, W. Wojciechowska, M. Klocek et al. // J. Hypertension. – 2008. – Vol. 26, Suppl. 10. – P. 2001–2007.
Salvi P. Comparative study of methodologies for pulse wave velocity estimation / P. Salvi, E. Magnani, F. Valbusa // J. Human Hypertension. – 2008. – Vol. 22, Suppl. 10. – P. 669–677.
The Vicorder device compared with SphygmoCor in the assessment of carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity in patients with peripheral arterial disease / Y. Shahin, H. Barakat, R. Barnes, I. Chetter // Hypertension Research. – 2013. – Vol. 36, Suppl. 3. – P. 208–212.
Comparison of the Complior Analyse device with Sphygmocor and Complior SP for pulse wave velocity and central pressure assessment / F. Stea, E. Bozec, S. Millasseau et al. // J. Hypertension. – 2014. – Vol. 32, Suppl. 4. – P. 873–880.
Sugawara J. Carotid-femoral pulse wave velocity: Impact of different arterial path length measurements / J. Sugawara, K. Hayashi, T. Yokoi // Artery Research. – 2010. – Vol. 4, Suppl. 1. – P. 27–31.