Abstract
In press
Background. Gunshot wounds of soft tissues remain a major challenge in modern surgery. Their microbiological profile is characterized by polymicrobial contamination (≈50% of cases) with a predominance of Gram-negative flora (≈80%). The increasing antimicrobial resistance limits the effectiveness of conventional treatment approaches for gunshot wounds.
Aim. To evaluate the clinical efficacy of photodynamic therapy in the local treatment of gunshot soft tissue wounds.
Materials and Methods. A non-randomized comparative study was conducted involving 40 patients with combat fragmentation wounds of the soft tissues of the extremities. Patients were divided into two groups: the main group (n=20), treated with photodynamic therapy, and the comparison group (n=20), receiving standard treatment. Treatment effectiveness was assessed based on wound area dynamics, healing rate, level of microbial contamination, complication rate, and duration of hospitalization. Statistical analysis was performed using Epi Info 8.0 software (CDC, USA). The study was conducted within the framework of the research project with state registration number 0124U002908 and the author's dissertation.
Research Ethics. The study was conducted in accordance with the principles of the World Medical Association Declaration of Helsinki (1964–2024). Written informed consent was obtained from all patients. The study design and methods were approved by the Ethics Committee of Kharkiv National Medical University (Protocol No.2 of October 12, 2022).
Results. The use of photodynamic therapy resulted in a rapid reduction of microbial load: on day 5, contamination levels were [10²–10³] CFU/mL in 70% of patients in the main group versus 15% in the comparison group (p<0.01). A more pronounced reduction in wound area was observed: by day 14 – [55±3] mm² vs [75±5] mm² (p<0.01). The time to complete wound closure was [16.8±2.3] days in the main group compared to [18.4±3.1] days in the comparison group (p<0.05). The duration of hospital stay was shorter in the main group [16.5±1.8] days vs [19.2±2.1] days (p<0.05).
Conclusions. The obtained results indicate the effectiveness of photodynamic therapy. Its antimicrobial effect is combined with stimulation of reparative processes, leading to faster wound cleansing and healing. Photodynamic therapy effectively reduces microbial load in wounds and accelerates reparative processes. Its use shortens the time required for wound preparation for surgical closure and reduces the incidence of postoperative complications.
Keywords: surgery, photomodulation, wound healing, combat trauma.
References
Fast Facts: Firearm Injury and Death. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 5 Jul 2024 [Internet]. Available at: https://www.cdc.gov/firearm-violence/data-research/facts-stats/index.html [accessed 20 Mar 2026]
Chandra P, Faizan M, Porwal M, Sharma H, Sachan N. An Overview and Review of Growth Factors in Wound Healing: Emerging Trends and Innovations. Curr Diabetes Rev. 2026;22(1):1-27. DOI: 10.2174/0115733998332692241202072249. PMID: 40444617.
Viaña-Mendieta P, Sánchez ML, Benavides J. Rational selection of bioactive principles for wound healing applications: Growth factors and antioxidants. Int Wound J. 2022;19(1):100-13. DOI: 10.1111/iwj.13602. PMID: 33951280.
Zhao H, Sun J, Yang Y. Research progress of photodynamic therapy in wound healing: a literature review. Journal of Burn Care & Research. 2023;44(6):1327-33. DOI: 10.1093/jbcr/irad146. PMID: 37747820.
Beley NA, Loskutov OA, Strokan AM, Izmaylova OB. Evolution of the microbiota of wound infections in military personnel during the full-scale russian invasion (2022–2024): a retrospective cohort study. Emergency Medicine (Ukraine). 2024;20(7):615-21. Available at: https://emergency-journal.com/index.php/journal/article/download/1767/1828/1541 [in Ukrainian].
European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control. Antimicrobial resistance in the EU/EEA (EARS-Net) – Annual Epidemiological Report 2023. Stockholm: ECDC; 2024. 51 р. Available at: https://surl.li/kzfkft
Public Health Center of the Ministry of Health of Ukraine. Report on the results of enhanced epidemiological surveillance of antimicrobial resistance of microorganisms causing purulent-inflammatory wound infections in combat-injured patients for 2023–2024. Kyiv; 2025. 78 p. Available at: https://is.gd/sznzPq [in Ukrainian].
Yang Z, Hu X, Zhou L, He Y, Zhang X, Yang J, et al. Photodynamic therapy accelerates skin wound healing through promoting re-epithelialization. Burns Trauma. 2021;9:tkab008. DOI: 10.1093/burnst/tkab008. PMID: 34514005.
Ning X, He G, Zeng W, Xia Y. The photosensitizer-based therapies enhance the repairing of skin wounds. Front Med (Lausanne). 2022;9:915548. doi:10.3389/fmed.2022.915548. PMID: 36035433.
Aebisher D, Rogóż K, Myśliwiec A, Dynarowicz K, Wiench R, Cieślar G, et al. The use of photodynamic therapy in medical practice. Front Oncol. 2024 May 8;14:1373263. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2024.1373263. PMID: 38803535.
Qi M, Chi M, Sun X, Xie X, Weir MD, Oates TW, et al. Novel nanomaterial-based antibacterial photodynamic therapies to combat oral bacterial biofilms and infectious diseases. Int J Nanomedicine. 2019;14:6937-56. DOI: 10.2147/IJN.S212807. PMID: 31695368.
Mikhaylusov RN, Nehoduiko VV, Veligotsky AN, Romaev SN, Svirydenko LY. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of gunshot wounds of soft tissues. Photobiology and Photomedicine. 2019;(28):31-8. DOI: 10.26565/2076-0612-2019-28-04. [In Ukrainian].
Ivanova YV, Gramatiuk SM, Kryvoruchko IA, Prasol VO, Miasoiedov KV. Photodynamic therapy in the treatment of combat trauma. Ukrainian Journal of Clinical Surgery. 2023;90(4):25-30. DOI: 10.26779/2786-832X.2023.4.25. [In Ukrainian].

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
