Substantiation of the optimal choice of treatment tactics for patients with combined neurogenic pathology of the lower urinary tract and distal division of the colon
Vol 77 No 4 (2017), Urology
Vol 77 No 4 (2017)

Substantiation of the optimal choice of treatment tactics for patients with combined neurogenic pathology of the lower urinary tract and distal division of the colon

Urology
Published July 15, 2020
S.O. Vozianov
State Institution "Institute of Urology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
M.P. Zaharash
Bogomolets national medical university
P.V. Chabanov
State Institution "Institute of Urology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
Yu.M. Zaharash
Bogomolets national medical university
N.A. Sevast’anova
State Institution "Institute of Urology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
V.Yu. Ugarov
State Institution "Institute of Urology of the National Academy of Medical Sciences of Ukraine"
A.S. Reprintseva
Center of primary health care №2 Solomyansky district, Kyiv
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

neurogenic bladder disorders
neurogenic bowel dysfunction

How to Cite

Vozianov, S., Zaharash, M., Chabanov, P., Zaharash, Y., Sevast’anova, N., Ugarov, V., & Reprintseva, A. (2020). Substantiation of the optimal choice of treatment tactics for patients with combined neurogenic pathology of the lower urinary tract and distal division of the colon. Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 77(4), 103-106. Retrieved from https://ecm.knmu.edu.ua/article/view/434
ACM ACS APA ABNT Chicago Harvard IEEE MLA Turabian Vancouver

Download Citation

Endnote/Zotero/Mendeley (RIS) BibTeX

Abstract

The article presents the results of treatment of patients with combined neurogenic pathology of the lower urinary tract and the distal part of the large intestine. It has been established that electromyography reflects the functional state of the urinary tract and distal colon sections in their combined pathology. Conservative treatment of patients of this category by means of electrostimulation is effective.
PDF (Українська)

References

Samaranayake C.B., Luo C., Plank A.W. et al. (2010). Systematic review on ventral rectopexy for rectal prolapse and intussusception. Colorectal disease: The official journal of the Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland. 12 (6): 504–512.

Abrams P., Andersson K.E., Birder L. et al. (2010). Fourth International Consultation on Incontinence Recommendations of the International Scientific Committee: Evaluation and treatment of urinary incontinence, pelvic organ prolapse and fecal incontinence. Neurourol Urodyn. 29: 213–240.

De R.J., Benco M., Kolarovszki B. et al. (2011). Urinary incontinence in degenerative spinal disease. Acta Chir Orthop Traumatol Cech. 78: 67–70.

Shin E.J. (2011). Surgical treatment of rectal prolapse. J. Korean Soc. Coloproctol. 27 (1): 5–12.

Glasgow S.C., Birnbaum E.H., Kodner I.J. et al. (2006). Preoperative anal manometry predicts continence after perineal proctectomy for rectal prolapse. Dis Colon Rectum. 49 (7): 1052–1058.

Thüroff J.W., Abrams P., Andersson K.-E. (2011). EAU Guidelineson Urinary Incontinence. European Urology. 59 (3): 387–400.

Nygaard I., Shaw J., Egger M.J. (2012). Exploring the association between lifetime physical activity and pelvic floor disorders: study and design challenges. Contemp Clin Trials. 33 (4): 819–827.