Comparative analysis of frusion response in participants of combat actions with injury eyes in combined with clinical manifestations of stress response
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

clinical manifestations of post-traumatic syndrome
psyhological maladjustment
frustration
stress
eye injury
fighting

How to Cite

Lisoviy, V. (2020). Comparative analysis of frusion response in participants of combat actions with injury eyes in combined with clinical manifestations of stress response. Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 83(2), 19-26. https://doi.org/10.35339/ekm.2019.83.02.03

Abstract

Investigated the frustration response of combatants with eye trauma in combination with clinical manifestations of stress responses of varying severity. As a result, the study found the following. In combatants with combat eye trauma and partial loss of the zone amid the phenomena of psychological maladjustment and post-traumatic syndrome, frustrating reactions are dominated by extrapunitive direction and consumer-pushing and self-defense types of response. The degree of social adaptability (GCR) is most affected by combatants with a combat eye injury and partial loss of vision against the background of psychological maladjustment and post-traumatic syndrome, and less for everything with a domestic eye injury, which is confirmed by the data from the Holmes-Rag social adaptation test. Ways of frustration response in combatants with phenomena of psychological maladjustment and post-traumatic syndrome without eye injury retain their features when combined with a combat eye injury. The subjective factors of frustration and stress in terms of quantity, content and relevance depend on the circumstances and the life environment of the individual. This suggests the likely inclusion in the action of psychological protection of the individual and adaptation to the presence of stress-frustration.
https://doi.org/10.35339/ekm.2019.83.02.03
PDF (Українська)

References

References

Trykhlib V.I., Duda O.K., Maidaniuk V.P., Tkachuk S.I. (2015). Struktura boiovoi travmy zalezhno vid kharakteru urazhuvalnykh faktoriv pid chas deiakykh suchasnykh lokalnykh viin, viiskovykh konfliktiv (ohliad literatury) [Structure of combat trauma, depending on the nature of the factors of the impact during some modern local wars, military conflicts (literature review)]. Simeina medytsyna –

Family medicine, № 4 (60), pp. 63 – 70 [in Ukrainian].

Breeze J., Allanson–Bailey L.S., Hunt N.C. et al. (2012). Surface wound mapping of battlefield occulo–facial injury. Injury, vol. 43 (11), pp. 1856–1860.

Zhupan B.B. (2016). Udoskonalennia orhanizatsii spetsializovanoi oftalmolohichnoi dopomohy v khodi medychnoho zabezpechennia antyterorystychnoi operatsii [Improvement of the organization of specialized ophthalmic aid in the course of medical support of the anti-terrorist operation]. Problemy viiskovoi okhorony zdorovia – Military health issues, vol. 47, pp. 11–15 [in Ukrainian].

Abdriakhimov R.A. (2018). Frustratsiini reaktsii v uchasnykiv boiovykh dii z travmoiu ochei ta chastkovoiu vtratoiu zoru [Frustration reactions in combatants with eye trauma and partial vision loss]. Psykhiatriia, nevrolohiia ta medychna psykholohiia – Psychiatry, neurology and medical psychology, № 9, pp. 72–77 [in Ukrainian].

Malkina-Pykh I.H. (2005). Psykholohichna dopomoha v kryzovykh sytuatsiiakh [Psychological assistance in crisis situations]. Moskow. Yzd–vo Eksmo. 960 p. [in Ukrainian].

Tarabryna N.V. (2001). Praktykum z psykholohii posttravmatychnoho stresu. (Seriia «Praktykum z psykholohii») [Guide about psychology of post-traumatic stress. (Series «Guide of psychology»)]. SPb.: Piter.,. 272 p. [in Russian].

Ahaiev N.A., Kokun O.M., Pishko I.O., Lozinska N.S., Ostapchuk V.V., Tkachenko V.V. (2016). .Zbirnyk metodyk dlia diahnostyky nehatyvnykh psykhichnykh staniv viiskovosluzhbovtsiv [Collection of methods for diagnostics of negative mental states of servicemen: Metodychnyi posibnyk]. Kiiv.: NDTs HP ZSU, pp. 208–225 [in Ukrainian].

Dermanova Y.B (Eds.). (2002). Test Rozentsveiha. Metodyka rysunochnoi frustratsyy (modyfykatsyia N.V.Tarabrynoi) Dyahnostyka эmotsyonalno– nravstvennoho razvytyia [Rosenzweig test Method of pattern frustration (modification by N.V. Tarabryna). Diagnosis of emotional and moral development]. SPb., pp.150–172 [in Russian].

Raihorodskyi D.Ia. (2000). Metodyka opredelenyia stressoustoichyvosty y sotsyalnoi adaptatsyy T. Kholmsa y R. Paikha (Holmes T., Rahe R., 1967). Praktycheskaia psykhodyahnostyka [Methods for determining stress tolerance and social adaptation by T. Holms and R. Paich (Holmes T., Rahe R., 1967). Practical Psychodiagnostics]. Samara: BAKhRAM, 672 p. [in Russian].

Shcherbatukh Yu.V. (2005). Psykholohyia stressa. [Psychology of stress]. Moskow: Yzd–vo Эksmo, 304 p. [in Russian].