Modern methods of cognitive functions analysis (literature review, part 1)
PDF (Українська)

Keywords

psychophysiological tests
brain
cognitive disorders
screening test
dementia

How to Cite

Maslova, N., & Bulynina, O. (2024). Modern methods of cognitive functions analysis (literature review, part 1). Experimental and Clinical Medicine, 93(1). https://doi.org/10.35339/ekm.2024.93.1.mab

Abstract

In press

In the field of modern medicine, there is a significant focus on addressing cognitive impairments due to their widespread prevalence and substantial impact on patients' quality of life. The human brain's cognitive functions are closely tied to a wide range of structural and functional characteristics of individual brain regions, as well as the specific interactions between these regions. When individuals engage in cognitive activities, such as solving complex tasks, the efficiency of processing and transmitting information between different brain areas becomes a key consideration. Each of these brain regions is meticulously designed to assess various neuropsychological functions, including memory, language, executive function, abstract thinking, attention, and visuospatial abilities. Recently, healthcare professionals and researchers have been increasingly focusing on pre-dementia (mild and moderate) cognitive impairments. The spectrum of cognitive impairments in the elderly is broad, encompassing not only dementia and Alzheimer's disease but also less severe, moderate cognitive impairments. Assessment tools vary, ranging from those designed to evaluate a single neuropsychological domain to comprehensive neuropsychological testing, which evaluates all neuropsychological domains. This review provides an analysis of the most common modern methods, including classical neuropsychological tests and the use of eye-tracking technology, which offers quantitative assessment and sensitive detection of cognitive impairments in conditions such as dementia, concussion, traumatic brain injuries, autism spectrum disorders, and attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, among others. The review also discusses the advantages and limitations of these methodologies, highlighting the necessity of a comprehensive approach to assessing cognitive functions. This comprehensive approach is crucial for diagnosing both severe and mild cognitive impairments, evaluating brain damage, determining decision-making capacity, and testing for intellectual disabilities.

Keywords: psychophysiological tests, brain, cognitive disorders, screening test, dementia.

https://doi.org/10.35339/ekm.2024.93.1.mab
PDF (Українська)

References

Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Mora-Simon S, Patino-Alonso MC, García-García R, Escribano-Hernández A, Garcia-Ortiz L, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in individuals aged over 65 in an urban area: DERIVA study. BMC Neurol. 2011;11:147. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-147. PMID: 22093337.

De Looze C, Feeney J, Seeher KM, Amuthavalli Thiyagarajan J, Diaz T, Kenny RA. Assessing cognitive function in longitudinal studies of ageing worldwide: some practical considerations. Age Ageing. 2023;52(Suppl_4):iv13-25. DOI: 10.1093/ageing/afad122. PMID: 37902512.

Langa KM, Ryan LH, McCammon RJ, Jones RN, Manly JJ, Levine DA, et al. The Health and Retirement Study Harmonized Cognitive Assessment Protocol Project: Study Design and Methods. Neuroepidemiology. 2020;54(1):64-74. DOI: 10.1159/000503004. PMID: 31563909.

Haier RJ, Jung RE, Yeo RA, Head K, Alkire MT. Structural brain variation and general intelligence. Neuroimage. 2004;23(1):425-33. DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.04.025. PMID: 15325390.

Pietschnig J, Gerdesmann D, Zeiler M, Voracek M. Of differing methods, disputed estimates and discordant interpretations: the meta-analytical multiverse of brain volume and IQ associations. R Soc Open Sci. 2022;9(5):211621. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.211621. PMID: 35573038.

Klasik A, Janas-Kozik M, Krupka-Matuszczyk I, Augustyniak E. Funkcje poznawcze, ich rozwój oraz nowoczesne metody diagnozowania [Cognitive functions, their development and modern diagnostic methods]. Przegl Lek. 2006;63(Suppl_1):29-34. PMID: 17471820. [In Polish].

Jung RE, Haier RJ. The Parieto-Frontal Integration Theory (P-FIT) of intelligence: converging neuroimaging evidence. Behav Brain Sci. 2007;30(2):135-54; discussion 154-87. DOI: 10.1017/S0140525X07001185. PMID: 17655784.

Ohtake M, Abe K, Hasegawa M, Itokazu T, Selvakumar V, et al. Encoding of self-initiated actions in axon terminals of the mesocortical pathway. Neurophotonics. 2024;11(3):033408. DOI: 10.1117/1 NPh.11.3.033408. PMID: 38726349.

Basu R, Gebauer R, Herfurth T, Kolb S, Golipour Z, Tchumatchenko T, Ito HT. The orbitofrontal cortex maps future navigational goals. Nature. 2021;599(7885):449-452. DOI: 10.1038/s41586-021-04042-9. PMID: 34707289.

Miller EK, Cohen JD. An integrative theory of prefrontal cortex function. Annu Rev Neurosci. 2001;24:167-202. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.neuro.24.1.167. PMID: 11283309.

Kokubo K, Suzuki K, Hattori N, Miyai I, Mori E. Executive Dysfunction in Patients with Putaminal Hemorrhage. J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2015;24(9):1978-85. DOI: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2015.04.047. PMID: 26187790.

Chun CT, Seward K, Patterson A, Melton A, MacDonald-Wicks L. Evaluation of Available Cognitive Tools Used to Measure Mild Cognitive Decline: A Scoping Review. Nutrients. 2021;13(11):3974. DOI: 10.3390/nu13113974. PMID: 34836228.

Rodriguez-Sanchez E, Mora-Simon S, Patino-Alonso M, Garcia-Garcia R, Escribano-Hernandez A, Garcia-Ortiz L, et al. Prevalence of cognitive impairment in individuals aged over 65 in an urban area: DERIVA study. BMC Neurol. 2011;11(1):147. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-11-147. PMID: 22093337.

Barker MS, Bender JR, Chow J, Robinson GA. An emotion-eliciting version of the Hayling Sentence Completion Test. J Clin Exp Neuropsychol. 2022;44(9):665-80. DOI: 10.1080/13803395.2022.2157797. PMID: 36562376.

Sejunaite K, Gaucher F, Lanza C, Riepe MW. Clock Drawing Test: Types of Errors and Accuracy in Early Cognitive Screening. J Alzheimers Dis. 2023;95(4):1597-608. DOI: 10.3233/JAD-230110. PMID: 37718798.

Spenciere B, Alves H, Charchat-Fichman H. Scoring systems for the Clock Drawing Test: A historical review. Dement Neuropsychol. 2017;11(1):6-14. DOI: 10.1590/1980-57642016dn11-010003. PMID: 29213488.

Weiner MF, Hynan LS, Rossetti H, Falkowski J. Luria's three-step test: what is it and what does it tell us? Int Psychogeriatr. 2011;23(10):1602-6. DOI: 10.1017/S1041610211000767. PMID: 21554794.

Beschin N, MacPherson SE, Barozzi N, Della Sala S. Luria's fist-edge-palm test: A small change makes a big difference. Cortex. 2023;169:191-202. DOI: 10.1016/j.cortex.2023.09.011. PMID: 37944207.

Kamphuis GH. [A study on the reliability of the Bourdon Wiersma test]. Ned Tijdschr Psychol. 1962;17:269-75. PMID: 14453502. [In Dutch].

Zakharova MN, Machinskaya RI. Voluntary Control of Cognitive Activity in Preschool Children: Age-dependent Changes from Ages 3-4 to 4-5. Psychol Russ. 2023;16(3):122-131. DOI: 10.11621/pir.2023.0309. PMID: 38024576.

Petersen RC, Smith GE, Waring SC, Ivnik RJ, Tangalos EG, Kokmen E. Mild cognitive impairment: clinical characterization and outcome. Arch Neurol. 1999;56(3):303-8. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.56.3.303. Erratum in: Arch Neurol 1999;56(6):760. PMID: 10190820.

Cervera-Crespo T, Gonzalez-Alvarez J. Age and Semantic Inhibition Measured by the Hayling Task: A Meta-Analysis. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2017;32(2):198-214. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw088. PMID: 28365747.

Pérez-Pérez A, Matias-Guiu JA, Cáceres-Guillén I, Rognoni T, Valles-Salgado M, Fernández-Matarrubia M, Moreno-Ramos T, Matías-Guiu J. The Hayling Test: Development and Normalization of the Spanish Version. Arch Clin Neuropsychol. 2016;31(5):411-9. DOI: 10.1093/arclin/acw027. PMID: 27246958.

Petersen RC, Doody R, Kurz A, Mohs RC, Morris JC, Rabins PV, et al. Current concepts in mild cognitive impairment. Arch Neurol. 2001;58(12):1985-92. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.58.12.1985. PMID: 11735772.

Lima CF, Meireles LP, Fonseca R, Castro SL, Garrett C. The Frontal Assessment Battery (FAB) in Parkinson's disease and correlations with formal measures of executive functioning. J Neurol. 2008;255(11):1756-61. DOI: 10.1007/s00415-008-0024-6. PMID: 18821046.

Cohen OS, Vakil E, Tanne D, Molshatzki N, Nitsan Z, Hassin-Baer S. The frontal assessment battery as a tool for evaluation of frontal lobe dysfunction in patients with Parkinson disease. J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol. 2012;25(2):71-7. DOI: 10.1177/0891988712445087. PMID: 22689698.

Takagi R, Kajimoto Y, Kamiyoshi S, Miwa H, Kondo T. [The frontal assessment battery at bed side(FAB) in patients with Parkinson's disease]. No To Shinkei. 2002;54(10):897-902. PMID: 12476579. [In Japanese].

Biundo R, Weis L, Pilleri M, Facchini S, Formento-Dojot P, Vallelunga A, Antonini A. Diagnostic and screening power of neuropsychological testing in detecting mild cognitive impairment in Parkinson's disease. J Neural Transm (Vienna). 2013;120(4):627-33. DOI: 10.1007/s00702-013-1004-2. PMID: 23483334.

Slachevsky A, Villalpando JM, Sarazin M, Hahn-Barma V, Pillon B, Dubois B. Frontal assessment battery and differential diagnosis of frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease. Arch Neurol. 2004;61(7):1104-7. DOI: 10.1001/archneur.61.7.1104. PMID: 15262742.

Cunha PJ, Nicastri S, de Andrade AG, Bolla KI. The frontal assessment battery (FAB) reveals neurocognitive dysfunction in substance-dependent individuals in distinct executive domains: Abstract reasoning, motor programming, and cognitive flexibility. Addict Behav. 2010;35(10):875-81. doi: 10.1016/j.addbeh.2010.05.005. PMID: 20584570.

Paviour DC, Winterburn D, Simmonds S, Burgess G, Wilkinson L, Fox NC, et al. Can the frontal assessment battery (FAB) differentiate bradykinetic rigid syndromes? Relation of the FAB to formal neuropsychological testing. Neurocase. 2005;11(4):274-82. DOI: 10.1080/13554790590962933. PMID: 16093228.

Han M, Kim DY, Leigh JH, Kim MW. Value of the Frontal Assessment Battery Tool for Assessing the Frontal Lobe Function in Stroke Patients. Ann Rehabil Med. 2020;44(4):261-72. DOI: 10.5535/arm.19111. PMID: 32721991.

Kopp B, Rosser N, Tabeling S, Sturenburg HJ, de Haan B, Karnath HO, Wessel K. Performance on the Frontal Assessment Battery is sensitive to frontal lobe damage in stroke patients. BMC Neurol. 2013;13:179. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2377-13-179. PMID: 24237624.

Yajima S, Nakanishi Y, Matsumoto S, Ookubo N, Tanabe K, Kataoka M, Masuda H. The Mini-Cog: A simple screening tool for cognitive impairment useful in predicting the risk of delirium after major urological cancer surgery. Geriatr Gerontol Int. 2022;22(4):319-24. DOI: 10.1111/ggi.14367. PMID: 35253337.

Tran J, Nimojan T, Saripella A, Tang-Wai DF, Butris N, Kapoor P, et al. Rapid cognitive assessment tools for screening of mild cognitive impairment in the preoperative setting: A systematic review and meta-analysis. J Clin Anesth. 2022;78:110682. DOI: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2022.110682. PMID: 35193049.

Arevalo-Rodriguez I, Smailagic N, Roque-Figuls M, Ciapponi A, Sanchez-Perez E, Giannakou A, et al. Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) for the early detection of dementia in people with mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021;7(7):CD010783. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD010783.pub3. PMID: 34313331.

Martino PL, Cervigni MA, Infante L, Audisio EO, Politis DG. Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE): valores normativos para el área metropolitana de la ciudad de Rosario, Argentina [Mini Mental State Examination (MMSE): Normative data for the Rosario Metropolitan Area, Argentina]. Vertex. 2020;XXX(147):1-8. PMID: 33890924. [In Spanish].

Gallegos M, Morgan ML, Cervigni M, Martino P, Murray J, Calandra M, et al. 45 Years of the mini-mental state examination (MMSE): A perspective from ibero-america. Dement Neuropsychol. 2022;29;16(4):384-87. DOI: 10.1590/1980-5764-DN-2021-0097. PMID: 36530763.

Tombaugh TN, McIntyre NJ. The mini-mental state examination: a comprehensive review. J Am Geriatr Soc. 1992;40(9):922-35. DOI: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.1992.tb01992.x. PMID: 1512391.

Gonçalves J, Gerardo B, Nogueira J, Afonso RM, Freitas S. Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): An update normative study for the Portuguese population. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023;14:1-7. DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2023.2252949. PMID: 37708840.

Rashedi V, Foroughan M, Chehrehnegar N. Psychometric Properties of the Persian Montreal Cognitive Assessment in Mild Cognitive Impairment and Alzheimer Disease. Dement Geriatr Cogn Dis Extra. 2021;11(1):51-7. DOI: 10.1159/000514673. PMID: 33976692.

Carson N, Leach L, Murphy KJ. A re-examination of Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) cutoff scores. Int J Geriatr Psychiatry. 2018;33(2):379-88. DOI: 10.1002/gps.4756. PMID: 28731508.

Noyes ET, Major S, Wilson AM, Campbell EB, Ratcliffe LN, Spencer RJ. Reliability and Factor Structure of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination. Clin Gerontol. 2023;46(4):525-31. DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2120446. PMID: 36068666.

Spencer RJ, Noyes ET, Bair JL, Ransom MT. Systematic Review of the Psychometric Properties of the Saint Louis University Mental Status (SLUMS) Examination. Clin Gerontol. 2022;45(3):454-66. DOI: 10.1080/07317115.2022.2032523. PMID: 35107414.

Wu Y, Wang Y, Zhang Y, Yuan X, Gao X. A preliminary study of the Saint Louis University Mental Status examination (SLUMS) for the assessment of cognition in moderate to severe traumatic brain injury patients. Appl Neuropsychol Adult. 2023;30(4):409-13. DOI: 10.1080/23279095.2021.1952414. PMID: 34372718.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.